Engineering data for AI training: why CAD files and technical drawings are in demand
Luca Weber-SchäferUpdated 7 min read

Key points
- Models for engineering tasks are so far trained mainly on publicly available 3D data. Autodesk expects much better results from professional datasets.
- The first buying programs name technical drawings and CAD models explicitly. The market reports requests for PCB CAD, architecture and construction.
- Native formats, complete projects with plan revisions and bills of materials, and long time spans are what make a dataset valuable.
- Under German law, technical drawings can be protected under § 2(1) no. 7 UrhG. For architectural plans, the copyright stays with the planner.
- No prices for engineering data from companies have been published yet.
Many firms keep completed projects as folders on their servers: installation plans, manufacturing drawings, assemblies and plan revisions from many years. These are exactly the documents AI labs are interested in, because every file contains dimensions, tolerances, standards and spatial relationships. This article describes who is looking for such data, what makes it valuable and which rights need to be cleared first.
Why do AI labs look for engineering data?
Because AI models are increasingly expected to handle technical tasks, and there is hardly any professional training data for them.
Models that are meant to generate a CAD model from a description or read a technical drawing have to understand geometry, structure and function. Research has so far worked mainly with freely available models. A well-known example is the ABC dataset with around one million CAD models from the Onshape platform.[1] Autodesk trained its experimental 3D model Bernini on ten million 3D shapes from publicly available data and writes that the models will become much more useful when trained on larger, higher-quality professional datasets.[2]
Professional projects differ from such collections: they consist of many related files, go through several plan revisions and are bound by real requirements such as standards, building codes and manufacturing limits. Such datasets sit almost exclusively with the companies that created them.
Who buys such data?
So far only a few programs, and prices are not public. But the demand is becoming visible.
The Who Sells Data directory lists around 30 programs that pay companies for data. Most of them look for communications, ticket and business data. The only one there that names technical drawings and CAD models explicitly is The General Data Company, which buys industrial operating records for a one-off price or a revenue share; Opendatabay lists 3D spatial data as a data type of its own.[3] A summary of a podcast with Ryan Lock, co-founder of the data broker Polyshares, names PCB CAD, architecture, heavy construction and game 3D as current requests from labs.[4]
Shutterstock shows that 3D data is licensed for payment: together with NVIDIA, the company trains generative 3D models on its own 3D library and compensates the creators through a fund.[5] For engineering data from companies, no prices have been published yet. How we value a dataset is described in the article What is company data worth?
What makes engineering data valuable?
Native formats, complete projects, context and long time spans.
| Feature | Most valuable | Less valuable |
|---|---|---|
| Format | Native formats with parameters and design history (STEP, Inventor, Revit, IFC) | Exports as PDF or scans |
| Completeness | Entire projects with all plan revisions | Individual drawings without context |
| Context | Bills of materials, change notices, acceptance and defect records | Geometry only |
| Time span | Many years and many projects | A few similar projects |
| Rights | The company's own designs | Client drawings and architects' plans without consent |
Datasets in which a project can be followed across several systems are particularly sought after: from the quote through planning to acceptance, with the related emails and tickets. A model then sees not only the result but also the decisions along the way.
Which rights need to be cleared?
Who created the documents and for whom. With engineering data, the rights often do not lie with the company alone.
- Under German law, technical drawings and plans can be protected as depictions of a technical nature (§ 2(1) no. 7 UrhG).[6] The Federal Court of Justice considers a low degree of individual character sufficient, with a correspondingly narrow scope of protection.[7] Only the form of the depiction is protected, not its technical content.[8]
- Architects' plans can additionally be protected as designs for works of architecture (§ 2(1) no. 4 UrhG). The copyright stays with the planner, and the client receives rights of use only to the extent the purpose of the contract requires (§ 31(5) UrhG).[9] A licence for AI training is unlikely to be covered without an express agreement.
- The company's own designs, especially for current products, can be trade secrets (§ 2 no. 1 GeschGehG).[10] It therefore makes sense to license completed projects and discontinued product lines.
- Drawings supplied by clients and projects under a non-disclosure agreement need consent or are excluded.
How we clean title blocks, metadata and site plans is described on the page Selling engineering data.
How do you prepare a dataset?
Take stock, clear the rights and keep the originals unchanged.
- Take stock: which formats, how many projects, how far back and on which servers.
- Clear the rights: separate the company's own designs, client drawings, architects' plans and confidentiality agreements.
- Keep native formats: do not convert to PDF and do not merge plan revisions.
- Do not delete anything rashly: back up project folders before clearing servers.
Frequently asked questions
Do AI labs buy CAD files?
Yes, and demand is growing. In the Who Sells Data directory, one buying program so far names technical drawings and CAD models explicitly, and the market reports requests for PCB CAD, architecture and construction. No prices have been published yet.
Is engineering data worth more than email?
Per file, usually yes, because every file contains many verifiable details. The price still depends on volume, completeness, time span and the rights position.
Are technical drawings protected by copyright?
Under German law they can be, as depictions of a technical nature under § 2(1) no. 7 UrhG. The Federal Court of Justice considers a low degree of individual character sufficient. The depiction is protected, not the technology it shows.
Should plans be converted to PDF before a sale?
No. Native formats contain parameters, layers and design revisions and are far more valuable than exports.
Sources
- [1]Koch, Matveev, Jiang, Williams, Artemov, Burnaev, Alexa, Zorin, Panozzo (CVPR 2019): “ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset For Geometric Deep Learning”
- [2]Autodesk News: “Autodesk unveils Research Project Bernini for generative AI 3D shape creation”, 8 May 2024
- [3]Who Sells Data (Secludy): “Buying: programs that pay for company data”, accessed 24 October 2026
- [4]Minewell (summary by Jacky Chou): “Learn: podcast with Ryan Lock, co-founder of Polyshares”, 16 October 2026
- [5]Shutterstock (press release): “Shutterstock Teams With NVIDIA to Build AI Foundation Models for Generative 3D Artist Tools”, 21 March 2023
- [6]Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany): “§ 2 UrhG, protected works”
- [7]Federal Court of Justice (lexetius.com): “BGH, judgment of 28 February 1991, I ZR 88/89 (Explosionszeichnungen, exploded-view drawings)”
- [8]Federal Court of Justice (rewis.io): “BGH, judgment of 13 November 2013, I ZR 143/12 (Geburtstagszug)”
- [9]Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany): “§ 31 UrhG, granting of rights of use”
- [10]Federal Ministry of Justice (Germany): “§ 2 GeschGehG (German Trade Secrets Act), definitions”
This article describes the market as of 24 October 2026 and is not legal advice for an individual case. Legal statements refer to German law.
What is your dataset worth?
Nine questions, no data needed, no upfront costs. You receive a first estimate.




