What is company data worth? Prices, buyer programmes and deals in 2026
Luca Weber-SchäferUpdated 12 min read
Key points
- Ten buyers and marketplaces publish prices for internal company data. The ranges run from US$10,000 to more than US$5 million per company; most programmes start at US$100,000.
- For a company with 100 employees and 10 years of operations, Handshake calculates US$383,000 to US$897,000.
- Documented deals range from US$20,000 (the smallest deal at Ooak Data) to the highest bid of US$10 million for Spirit Airlines' data.
- The buyers are well capitalised: Mercor is valued at US$10 billion, Meta has invested US$14.3 billion in Scale AI, and micro1 has announced a purchasing budget of US$1 billion.
- The price is driven by headcount, years in operation, linked systems, data volume, industry, exclusivity and cleared rights.
Since 2026 there has been a market for internal company data with published prices. Data vendors that supply AI labs openly solicit email archives, ticket systems, CRM and ERP data on their websites and quote specific amounts for them. The register Who Sells Data lists 170 providers of training data and training environments.[16] This article compiles prices, documented deals and funding rounds with sources and shows how buyers value a dataset.
What do buyers pay for internal company data?
Depending on size, between US$10,000 and several million. For a mid-sized company with 50 to 250 employees, the published figures are in the six-figure range.
The most detailed public scale by company size is published by Replay, a New York buyer specialising in company data.[7] Handshake AI, which supplies OpenAI among others, offers a calculator: for 100 employees and 10 years in operation it gives US$383,000 to US$897,000.[5][27]
Which deals involving company data are documented?
Publicly documented are mainly cases from the US: the auction of Spirit Airlines' data and a growing number of sales by wound-up start-ups.
Spirit Airlines: US$10 million for emails and Teams messages
In the US airline's bankruptcy, around 100 million emails, 500 million Microsoft Teams entries, code and operational data were auctioned. Google won the auction with US$10 million against Mercor with US$7.5 million; micro1 then put forward US$12.5 million, combined with additional privacy commitments. Customer profiles are excluded.[1] The court approval hearing was postponed four times and is scheduled for 6 November 2026.[2]
Wound-up start-ups: US$10,000 to US$100,000 per company
The US wind-down service provider SimpleClosure supported almost 100 data sales in the twelve months to April 2026, with proceeds of US$10,000 to US$100,000 per company.[4] There are now more than 150 deals; according to CEO Dori Yona, 47% of SimpleClosure's deals include a sale of code or data. SimpleClosure expects payouts of more than US$10 million to start-ups by the end of 2026.[3] One example: a crypto start-up around two and a half years old received about US$25,000 for its code and expects around another US$15,000 for data from Google Workspace, Notion, Figma and Slack.[3]
Ooak Data: deals from US$20,000
The buyer Ooak Data openly states its previous deals: the smallest was US$20,000, the largest several hundred thousand US dollars. Ooak buys from operating companies, companies being wound up and companies that have already closed; according to Ooak, a liquidator or insolvency administrator can also sign.[12]
micro1: more than 50 transactions in 45 days
In its filing in the Spirit proceedings, micro1 stated that it had completed more than 50 data transactions in the preceding 45 days, without naming sellers or prices.[1] In October 2026 the company announced that it would spend US$1 billion on company data over twelve months, financed by Citi and Hercules Capital.[24]
What do the data buyers' programmes pay?
Most programmes quote US$100,000 as the entry point and US$1 million to US$5 million as the cap. Some pay once, others additionally pay on every further licence.
| Buyer | Stated payment | Requirements and data sought | Payment model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Handshake AI[5] | US$100,000 to over US$4 million | From small businesses to large corporations | Scope, safeguards and terms agreed in advance |
| Mode[6] | US$100,000–5 million (indicative) | From 30 employees; law firms from 6, financial and medical practices from 10; focus on the US | Firm offer after reviewing systems, history and rights |
| Replay[7] | US$10,000 to over US$1 million, scaled by size | All industries | Upfront payment plus revenue share on every licence |
| Turing (Project Lazarus)[8] | One-off payment of up to US$1 million | Operating companies and companies being wound up | One payment, amount after a sample |
| Scale AI[9] | US$10,000 to over US$1 million (illustrative) | Preferably from 40 employees | Anonymisation in the company's environment, approval per data package |
| Labelbox (Prism)[10] | From about US$50,000 to over US$1 million | Sought include cross-system data from Salesforce, Jira, Slack | Upfront payment plus revenue share, exclusive by default |
| micro1[11] | Tiers from US$100,000, 500,000 and 1 million | SOPs, knowledge bases, CRM, project histories | By quality, uniqueness and value |
| Ooak Data[12] | Up to US$1 million; previous deals US$20,000 to several hundred thousand | Operating, being wound up or closed | Payment after delivery, raw data deleted within 30 days |
| Grepped (marketplace)[13] | US$20,000–5 million; up to six figures per connected workspace | Messages, code, documents, CRM, tickets | Payout after sale |
| pre.dev[14] | US$100 per million code tokens, US$40 per million tokens of Git history | Private code repositories | Non-exclusive, payment 15 days after receipt of funds |
There are also marketplaces without published prices. At data.cool, buyers bid on anonymous data sheets; the seller pays a 12% fee, the buyer a 4% surcharge, plus a 10% deposit and 10% retention until acceptance.[15] The register Who Sells Data, which usefully complements the overview of programmes, is operated by the vendor Secludy AI, which by its own account may itself sell to listed companies.[16]
How much money is flowing into the market for training data?
Billions. The largest data vendors are valued at US$10 billion to more than US$29 billion, and individual AI labs have discussed spending more than US$1 billion a year on training environments alone.
US$14.3bn
Meta's investment in Scale AI, valuation over US$29bn[18]
June 2025
US$10bn
Mercor's valuation after a US$350m Series C[21]
October 2025
about US$2bn
Mercor's annualised gross revenue (estimate)[23]
June 2026
over US$1bn
Surge AI's annual revenue, without external funding[19]
July 2025
US$1bn
micro1's purchasing budget for company data over twelve months[24]
October 2026
over US$1bn
Spending on training environments in one year discussed by Anthropic[17]
according to The Information, 2025
The money is increasingly going into data from real workflows. Surge AI held talks about a valuation of at least US$25 billion.[20] In July 2026 Mercor acquired Deeptune, which had rebuilt hundreds of business applications for training and had previously raised US$43 million.[22] micro1 was valued at US$500 million in a US$35 million Series A in 2025.[1] Realset AI raised US$10 million for training data from real workflows in September 2026,[26] and the wind-down service SimpleClosure, which now brokers data sales, raised US$15 million in a Series A.[25]
For a single training task, labs usually pay US$200 to US$2,000, and contracts between providers of training environments and labs are often in the six- to seven-figure range per quarter.[17] According to Wired, OpenAI together with Handshake AI asked contractors to upload real work products from previous jobs, as files rather than summaries.[27] Both show how scarce real work data are.
How do buyers value a dataset?
By headcount, years in operation, systems and data volume. Several buyers state these criteria explicitly on their websites.
| Factor | What buyers say | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Headcount | “Headcount is a proxy”: Replay scales by size, Mode and Scale AI state minimum sizes of 30 and 40 employees | [7][6][9] |
| Years in operation | Handshake calculates with years in business, Mode checks the years of history, Labelbox looks for support histories of six months or more | [5][6][10] |
| Linked systems | Labelbox rates cross-system data with timestamps and roles as urgently needed; Ooak looks for the relationships between tools, teams and workflows | [10][12] |
| Data volume and usage | Replay asks how much data sits in each application; the broker Sunset also assesses how intensively a team used its tools | [7][3] |
| Industry | Mode accepts law firms from 6 and financial or medical practices from 10 employees; Labelbox primarily seeks financial and scientific data | [6][10] |
| Exclusivity | For training environments, exclusive deals cost about 4 to 5 times as much as non-exclusive ones; Labelbox licenses exclusively by default | [17][10] |
| Rights | Mode checks ownership and access rights, Turing only sets the amount after a sample | [6][8] |
How is company data paid for?
As a one-off payment, as an upfront payment with a revenue share, or as a purchase price via a marketplace.
- One-off payment: Turing pays once, up to US$1 million, with no ongoing obligation.[8]
- Upfront payment plus revenue share: Replay and Labelbox pay on signing and give the seller a share of every further licence.[7][10]
- Volume pricing: pre.dev pays for code by tokens, for example US$6,000 for a repository with 20 million code tokens and 100 million tokens of Git history.[14]
- Marketplace: at data.cool buyers bid on the dataset and the platform retains fees; Grepped pays out after the sale.[15][13]
What lowers the value of a dataset?
Unclear rights, gaps in the systems and content that cannot be reliably anonymised.
- Unclear rights, for example data processed on behalf of third parties, or licence agreements that rule out passing data on.
- A high share of sensitive data such as personnel files or health information that must be excluded.
- Gaps: individual systems are missing, mailboxes have been deleted, periods are incomplete.
- Legal uncertainty, such as unresolved approvals, delays the deal.
How data assets are treated on the balance sheet is covered in Data assets on the balance sheet. The buyer side is covered in Selling company data for AI training.
Frequently asked questions
What is a company's dataset worth?
The published buyer programmes quote US$10,000 to more than US$5 million per company. For 50 to 250 employees, Replay quotes US$100,000 to US$1 million; Handshake calculates US$383,000 to US$897,000 for an example company with 100 employees and 10 years. For Spirit Airlines' data, US$7.5 million to US$12.5 million was offered.
What drives the price?
Headcount, years in operation, number and linkage of systems, data volume and quality, industry, exclusivity and cleared rights. Several buyers state these criteria explicitly, for example Replay, Mode and Handshake.
How much more does an exclusive licence bring?
For training environments, exclusive deals cost roughly four to five times as much as non-exclusive ones, according to founders interviewed by Epoch AI. Labelbox licenses company data exclusively by default.
How is payment made?
As a one-off payment (for example Turing, up to US$1 million), as an upfront payment with a share of revenue from every further licence (Replay, Labelbox), or as a purchase price via a marketplace that retains fees (data.cool: 12% from the seller, 4% from the buyer).
How do I get an estimate for my dataset?
Through our questionnaire with nine questions, including industry, software, data volume, history and how the records are connected. No access to the data is needed, and there are no costs.
Sources
- [1]Fortune (Wen Shao): “Google wants Spirit Airlines' data. Micro1 wants to pay more”, 14 September 2026
- [2]Yahoo News: “Spirit Airlines wants to sell its data to Google. Is there a privacy issue?”, 10 October 2026
- [3]MIT Technology Review (Matthew King): “AI labs are buying data from dead startups to train their models”, 13 October 2026
- [4]Gizmodo (Bruce Gil), citing Forbes: “Failed companies are selling old Slack chats and email archives to train AI”, 17 April 2026
- [5]Handshake AI: “Data Partnerships”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [6]Mode: “Company data partnerships”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [7]Replay: “Value my data”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [8]Turing: “Project Lazarus”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [9]Scale AI: “Data Partnerships”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [10]Labelbox: “Prism: Data licensing”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [11]micro1: “Monetize your company's operational data”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [12]Ooak Data: “Partner with us”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [13]Grepped: “Sell your company's data to AI labs”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [14]pre.dev: “Code licensing”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [15]data.cool: “Fees”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [16]Who Sells Data (operated by Secludy AI): “Who's buying”, as of 14–16 October 2026
- [17]Epoch AI (Jean-Stanislas Denain, Chris Barber): “An FAQ on reinforcement learning environments”, 12 January 2026
- [18]Reuters, via New Straits Times: “Meta finalises investment in Scale AI, valuing startup at US$29bil”, 13 June 2025
- [19]SiliconANGLE: “Data labeling startup Surge AI seeking $1B in first capital raise, reports say”, 1 July 2025
- [20]Bloomberg: “Scale Rival Surge AI in Talks for Funding at $25 Billion Value”, 30 July 2025
- [21]TechCrunch: “Mercor quintuples valuation to $10B with $350M Series C”, 27 October 2025
- [22]Mercor: “Mercor to acquire Deeptune”, 9 July 2026
- [23]Sacra: “Mercor revenue, valuation & funding”, accessed 20 October 2026
- [24]The Next Web (Ana Maria Constantin): “micro1 commits $1bn to buy company data for training AI agents”, 9 October 2026
- [25]Crowdfund Insider: “SimpleClosure Announces $15M Series A Round Led By TTV Capital”, May 2025
- [26]PR Newswire: “Realset AI and Flatkey raise $10M Series A to build real-world training data”, 23 September 2026
- [27]TechCrunch (Anthony Ha), citing Wired: “OpenAI is reportedly asking contractors to upload real work from past jobs”, 10 January 2026
All amounts are published programme figures, bids or reported individual cases in US dollars, as in the sources. Programme figures are ranges or caps, not offers; buyers set the final amount after review. As of 20 October 2026.
Luca Weber-Schäfer
Founder of European Trainingdata
Luca Weber-Schäfer advises on the realisation and licensing of company data from insolvency, restructuring and company sales, from the first estimate to the anonymised handover to AI buyers.
What is your dataset worth?
Nine questions, no data needed, no upfront costs. You receive a first estimate.